Skip to main content
It looks like you're using Internet Explorer 11 or older. This website works best with modern browsers such as the latest versions of Chrome, Firefox, Safari, and Edge. If you continue with this browser, you may see unexpected results.

Literature Review: Readings

References/Suggested Reading

[Authentication for access may be required. UToledo affilaites: If full text is not available, use interlibrary loan to obtain a copy]

Difference between narrative and systematic reviews:

Quality of Systematic Reviews

Delgado-Rodríguez, M., & Sillero-Arenas, M. (2018). Systematic review and meta-analysis. Medicina intensiva, 42(7), 444–453. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medin.2017.10.003

Siddaway AP, Wood AM, Hedges LV. How to Do a Systematic Review: A Best Practice Guide for Conducting and Reporting Narrative Reviews, Meta-Analyses, and Meta-Syntheses. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:747-770. doi: 10.1146/annurev-psych-010418-102803. Epub 2018 Aug 8. PMID: 30089228.

Pollock, A., & Berge, E. (2018). How to do a systematic review. International journal of stroke : official journal of the International Stroke Society, 13(2), 138–156. https://doi.org/10.1177/1747493017743796

Robson, R. C., Pham, B., Hwee, J., Thomas, S. M., Rios, P., Page, M. J., & Tricco, A. C. (2019). Few studies exist examining methods for selecting studies, abstracting data, and appraising quality in a systematic review. Journal of clinical epidemiology, 106, 121–135. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclinepi.2018.10.003

Greyson D, Rafferty E, Slater L, et al. Systematic review searches must be systematic, comprehensive, and transparent: a critique of Perman et al. BMC Public Health. 2019;19(1):153. Published 2019 Feb 4. doi:10.1186/s12889-018-6275-y

Yaffe J, Montgomery P, Hopewell S, Shepard LD. Empty reviews: a description and consideration of Cochrane systematic reviews with no included studies. PLoS One. 2012;7(5):e36626. doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0036626

Salvador-Oliván JA, Marco-Cuenca G, Arquero-Avilés R. Errors in search strategies used in systematic reviews and their effects on information retrieval. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019;107(2):210‐221. doi:10.5195/jmla.2019.567

Price M. Letter to Editor regarding flawed method in Nursing Outlook systematic review. Nurs Outlook. 2017;65(1):6‐7. doi:10.1016/j.outlook.2016.10.002

Ioannidis JP. The Mass Production of Redundant, Misleading, and Conflicted Systematic Reviews and Meta-analyses. Milbank Q. 2016;94(3):485‐514. doi:10.1111/1468-0009.12210

Fox ZE, Williams AM, Blasingame MN, et al. Why equating all evidence searches to systematic reviews defies their role in information seeking. J Med Libr Assoc. 2019;107(4):613‐617. doi:10.5195/jmla.2019.707

Education

Health Science

Books for the UToledo Catalog